The researchers developed a way for teaching monkeys to change backwards and forwards between fast and accurate decision producing in an activity that involved choosing the target from a range of items presented on a screen. In a single experimental condition, monkeys discovered that just accurate responses will be rewarded. In another condition, they learned that producing some errors was okay, provided that the decisions had been fast. Meanwhile, the experts monitored signals from one neurons within their prefrontal cortex – the region in the brain focused on higher cognition.Faden coauthored the JAMA commentary with award-earning Johns Hopkins individual safety professional Peter J. Pronovost, M.D., M.P.H., a professor in the Departments of Anesthesiology and Vital Care Medicine and Medical procedures and director of Johns Hopkins Quality and Basic safety Analysis Group. Noting that lots of patient basic safety interventions are patterned after protection efforts in industrial aviation, Pronovost-whose ‘cockpit’ design checklists for intensive treatment unit staff are one example-factors out that deciding individual security priorities is usually infinitely more difficult than similar attempts to safeguard passenger safety. Aviation protection is nearly solely focused on an individual goal-preventing death, Pronovost says-while patient protection involves a number of technologies, treatment dangers, judgments and feasible outcomes in different populations.